Barack bi sexual sincalir lawsuit

David Smith's response letter to members of Congress dated Tuesday, January 16, simply failed to answer any of the specific allegations made by Mediacom and did not even attempt to justify Sinclair's continuing discrimination that has adversely impacted two million Mediacom cable viewers in , households in smaller communities across America. David Smith's effort to characterize the dispute as a "simple commercial negotiation" between two companies ignores two fundamental facts:. Even if Sinclair's outrageous conduct were to be upheld after all appeals are exhausted, that would simply mean that the law does not work as intended and Congress needs to act to immediately fix the broken statutory scheme so that American television viewers are protected from the choice of either paying billions of dollars in higher cable and DBS bills or a return to rabbit-ears to watch free over-the-air television. In order to avoid further confusion and help elected officials obtain a better understanding of all the facts in the dispute between Mediacom and Sinclair, today Mediacom's CEO challenges David Smith to join him in testifying unconditionally and under oath before Congress about the retransmission consent dispute between the companies. Congress may be required to do what the FCC has not yet done: hold Sinclair publicly accountable for its discrimination against Mediacom, its customers, and employees.